Track Record & Corrections
Anyone can call themselves independent. The difference is whether their past calls can be checked. This page keeps ours on the record: every audit verdict is dated and linked, so you can go back, rerun the math, and see whether we were right. When we get something wrong, it gets logged here with a date, and the original stays visible.
So far, every casino we've audited has passed the cryptographic check. That isn't a curated highlight reel; it's every audit we've run. Where the math passed but the business didn't, we said so in the same report.
The calls, on the record
Each entry links to the full report, with the raw scope so you can reproduce it.
- 2026-06-03 — BC.Game: The math was fair, the business wasn't. Games verified as provably fair. On the business side we flagged serious concerns, and in late 2024 a Curaçao court declared the operator's licensed entities bankrupt over unpaid player claims; its Curaçao licence went into revocation, a process the operator contested and that, by 2025, was reportedly heading for reversal. Our business-side flags were on the record before any of it broke. → Report
- 2026-06-03 — Roobet: Clean math, open questions. Provably fair verified, with the unresolved questions named openly. → Report
- 2026-06-04 — Stake.com: 250,000 rounds tested, full report. → Report
- 2026-06-14 — Bustabit: 500,000 rounds analyzed. → Report
- 2026-06-15 — Bitsler: 2.3 million rounds across 5 games, rated 9.8/10. → Report
- 2026-06-18 — Bustabit RNG consistency: 100 million rounds, our largest single audit. → Report
- 2026-06-23 — BC.Game Crash: 71,625 rounds, 19 of 19 statistical tests passed. → Report
- 2026-06-27 — Blaze Crash: 1.15 million rounds verified against Blaze's own published code. → Report
- 2026-07-30 — Aviator: we recalculated real rounds to test the "rigged" claim directly. → Report
Some of the casinos above are affiliate partners of ours and some are not. It makes no difference to the verdict, and which is which is spelled out on our Independence & Affiliate Disclosure page.
Corrections & transparency log
No published correction yet. This log is young, the audits start in June 2026, and its value grows with every dated entry. The day we get a number, a name, or a verdict wrong, it appears here with the date and what changed, and the original stays visible.
What we can already show is the discipline that keeps the correction count low:
- 2026-08-24 — Numbers we refused to use. Researching how bonus abuse tightens KYC and payouts, we found figures repeated across the industry ("63% of all iGaming fraud", "15% of annual revenue") that we could not trace to a verifiable source. We left them out and said so in the article. Only the one figure we could attribute, a LexisNexis operator survey, made the cut.
This is the FairPlay Standard in practice: dated, falsifiable, and open to being checked. Find a call we got wrong? Tell us, and it goes on this page.